No Offense
Let me pose a question to you. Perhaps this is an issue you've already thought about and come to terms with. If so, I'd like to hear from you.
How far does one go in "defending" the truth of our faith? Maybe I should phrase that, "how far does one go in defending our God?"
Do we defend our faith or our God? Given the Hitchens and Dawkins of our day and all the rest of the atheist manifestos out there, along with the Eckhart Tolle types, plus the rest of the contingent ever eager to
chip away at what the Christian believes in their attempts to replace the evidence of Christianity with their own jingoistic huffing and puffing, it seems almost a herculean effort to inform ourselves--at least to the point of formulating an intelligent opinion--of the different beliefs and perspectives that abound.
I don't like reading this stuff, especially when there are so many good things to read. Some of it is downright boring, some of it silly, and almost all of it irritating. But if I don't read it, then how do I muster an articulate opinion? (And that's another question: why do so many people ask writers our opinions? It's almost as if they expect us to know something about everything. I don't--and I don't want to. But even if I were a lot smarter than I am, why would I think I should have an opinion on just about everything?)
But I do wonder where the Christian's responsibility begins and ends in all this. Are we all supposed to be apologists? How many of us qualify for that role?
Honestly, some of these writings strike me as little more than drivel--a lot more bad writing than good--and I yawn my way through most of it. During a discussion of this same subject among a writers' internet group, one member commented that our God is "too big for this," referring to wasting time defending God or the faith against some of the atheist propaganda and other publications circulating these days. That's how I feel, too. I'm convinced God doesn't need any defense from me--but I've wanted to make certain this isn't simply me, defending my own disgust of the spewing and mewing going on.
Do you believe that God cares one way or the other if we're informed enough to argue the point, should we find ourselves in a position to do just that?
Approaching this strictly from a writer's perspective, given all the research reading we're compelled to do for our own work, and with the recreational reading we enjoy but have so little time to indulge in, where do we draw the line?
I've discussed this with other writers and searched the Scriptures, and the only basis I've been able to come up with regarding a defense doesn't involve going on the offense with these attacks on the Christian faith. It doesn't in any way suggest that we confront or argue with those bent on airing their own personal "doctrines." 1 Peter 3: 15-16 indicates that in our hearts we're to "set apart Christ as Lord," to "always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have." There's a huge difference in giving a reason for our hope rather than arguing against those who would mock or give the lie to that hope.
Some definitely are gifted in apologetics. The Holy Spirit seems to place them in places and positions where they can eloquently explain and defend and strike a real blow for the Truth. I'm not at all gifted in that respect. Until recently, I've asked myself just how far I should go when it comes to reading and exploring what, more times than not, does nothing but annoy me or make me roll my eyes--in other words, what seems a waste of time and counterproductive.
Well--I've decided that I've gone as far as I'm willing to go.
A friend and pastor seems to have come to the same conclusion. Responding to questions from others in his congregation, he discussed the fact that he's explored samples of some of the publications in question (and so in vogue with the media) and found himself wondering why he was wasting his time, that he was not only accomplishing nothing but was in fact using valuable time (of which he has no abundance) that could better be used in reading what builds up rather than what tears down.
There's the point: why not spend our reading time--and, if applicable, our money as well--on what's edifying and will more firmly ground us in our faith and draw us closer to God?
So that's where I am. I simply don't intend to lend support in terms of time or expense or energy to these misguided rants from the voices out in la-la land who speak from arenas in which I don't care to venture.
What's your take on all this? Feel free to email if you don't want to leave a public comment, but I'd like to know what you think.
BJ










