« October 2007 | Main | December 2007 »

Posts from November 2007

These Are a Few of My Favorite Things ... and Not

Clip8_7A recent question from a friend about Christmas called for more of an answer than I  usually give on Q & A, so it ended up as a post all to itself. The question:  "What do you like best about the Christmas season, and what do you like least?" I enjoyed thinking this through and even surprised myself in a couple of areas. Here's my reply:

What I like best: (In addition to the obvious: time with family and friends)

The music of the season.

Christmas books--especially short story collections and novels. Some are on the cheesy side, I'll grant you, but there are also some good ones available from the past and the present. And that just might prompt another post on "favorites."

The colors. I love the lights and decorations here at home and all around. Have you noticed how drab everything looks for a time after the house ... and the town ... are "undecorated?"

The "peace and good will" that warms the season. Yes, I know peace is a deceptive thing, even an illusion, in today's world--but in small towns and cities, with strangers at the mall as well as among our neighbors, there's a different "feeling," a mist of friendliness, a little less guardedness, and a certain lightheartedness ... for a time. We may not be able to define it, but it's different. And we need it.

Snow. Don't growl at me. I love snow, always have. Illness kept me shut in too many winters as a child. I was always looking out, watching others enjoy the white stuff. So when winter comes, I still look forward to that first snowfall and each one that follows. Sometimes, of course, Ohio winters disappoint us, and we don't see more than a trace until January or February, when it's not as welcome (to some) as it might have been in December. But I'll take its quiet beauty whenever it comes.

Children. What's not to love about a child at Christmas? No matter how much sugar he's had or how little sleep we might have had, there's a wonder, a sweet innocence and shining excitement that heightens our own joy and gives us a fresh breath of hope.

What I like least:

The retail holiday commercialism that begins before Halloween. Would it be asking too much to wait until Black Friday? It wasn't the Grinch who stole Christmas, folks--it was the media and the malls.

Retail advertising and sales folks wishing me "Happy Holidays." I return their bland, generic greeting with a gleefully enthusiastic "Merry Christmas!" This is our holiday season--a Christian season--and I'll gladly share it with anyone willing to observe it for what it is. But let's call it by its rightful name.

Dancing Santa dolls in the shopping malls with their fake "ho-ho-ho's" and off-key "Jingle Bell Rock" ... in mid September.

The song, "Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer" ... for obvious reasons.

Packing up the decorations for another year. I delay it as long as decently possible. I am so not one who can't wait to get the season over with so "things will get back to normal." Who wants normal?

The movie, "A Christmas Story." Gag. How long as it been since any kid asked for a BB gun anyway? And why would any parent give him one? And two thousand screenings of this chestnut are more than enough by now, don't you think?

BJ

An Interview with Nick Harrison

Nickharrison Last week, Nick Harrison, one of the nicest and most knowledgeable editors in the industry, answered some questions posed by author Angela Hunt and BJ. We think you'll find his replies of real interest.

-----

What does an editor do all day? Read? Sit in meetings? Fly around the country and look for raw talent? Can you give us a brief rundown of a typical day?

Usually a typical day has me working on a manuscript that’s in the pipeline to production. I write the catalog copy, do the first edit (called a substantive edit) before handing it off to a copy editor. Later, I will "merge" the corrected galleys from the author, write the back cover copy and do any number of other small tasks associated with the book. As might be expected, some books are more time-consuming than others. I’ve had books that have taken as long as two or three weeks of full time editing (though that’s rare). Others have been very easy edits, requiring just a few days of work.

When I’m not editing a manuscript, I review submissions. There are ALWAYS manuscripts here awaiting my evaluation. That too can be very time-consuming. Often, I know within a few pages if I need to keep reading...and other times, I realize that I’ll need to settle back and read the entire manuscript, investing several hours in the process. I like it when that happens. A potential new author for us! What a great feeling to have an "aha!" moment when reading a really fine manuscript by a new author. What’s’s really hard to handle is having that "aha" moment over a book that is truly excellent...but simply isn’t a good fit for Harvest House.

I do attend a few meetings, but not very many. I also go to about five conferences a year. But those are not "typical" days for me.

Another portion of my day (probably at least an hour) is keeping up with the CBA writing community by reading about a dozen blogs and news sites. Very informative!

How do you train to be an editor? What college major should a future editor choose?

Journalism, in my opinion. English would be a good minor. As for training, I suggest working in a bookstore and/or library, interacting with customers, learning what people like to read, discussing books. I’ve worked in both secular and Christian bookstores and in several libraries (including a wonderful stint driving a bookmobile). Books have been part of my vocational and personal life for nearly forty years.

And how did you know you would rather be an editor by day than a writer?

Um...well, I’m STILL not sure about that. I AM a writer, after all. I have more than fifty projects on my "wannado" list. And as with Angie, new ideas come at me all the time. But when I look at the authors I’ve worked with and the books I’ve had a hand in producing, I’m just as satisfied with my editorial work as with my own writing. But in my dreams, I still want a spot on PW’s bestseller list–both for me personally and for an author I work with.

How much changing do you do on a typical manuscript? Is every manuscript different (some require lots of work, some very little), or is it the writers who are different (some always require a lot of focusing, some require very little)? What do you do when/if a writer completely misses the mark?

Yes, as said above, some manuscripts require a lot of work, others less so. Since we do often work with established Harvest House authors, we tend to know ahead of time if an author is habitually late with a manuscript or will require a lot of editing. If an author completely misses the mark (and this is very rare), we will ask them to rework it. In some cases that may mean bumping the book to a following seasonal list rather than the one originally slated.

What would you love to see that you’ve never received across your desk? Manuscript-wise, that is.

This may sound strange, but I HAVE seen it. More than once. I’ve had two or three utterly enthralling manuscripts that gave me goose bumps they were so good--at least in my judgment. Sadly, the market doesn’t always agree with my tastes. I’ve loved books that have failed and not loved books that have sold well. But I think any editor would say the same thing.

Okay, here’s one rather embarrassing thing I’d love to see: being a fan of the old movies of the silver screen, I’d love for a noted actor or actress from days gone by to call me and say they want to write their autobiography and they want me to collaborate, and they want Harvest House to publish it. Wow.

What are the character qualities of your "dream writers?"

They must love writing. It’s wonderful to work with Christian authors who want to use their talents for spreading the gospel, but my dream writer is also deeply attached to the written word. To such a writer, it’s not just the message (as important as that is), but also the quality of the work being produced. They’re writing for the ages, not just the moment.

What are some of the most problematic areas you see in reading the proposals and manuscripts of new writers?

Well, since it’s fresh on my mind from the last question, I’d say that many writers are indeed writing for the moment, not for the ages. Their writing is often very good...but with the many would-be authors who are writing these days, "very good" isn’t always going to be good enough. So for me, I would say the writing itself is the biggest problem area in most manuscripts. Sure, there can be other problems. We get proposals that are clearly not a good fit for us or from authors who don’t really have the gravitas to write about the topic they’re writing on, but I think the quality of the writing is more problematic.

How do you feel about trends in the industry? What advice regarding trends would you give authors hoping to publish with Harvest House?

Ack. What a difficult question. On the one hand, I hate trends. But on the other, I recognize that they exist and must be factored in when deciding on whether or not to publish a book. I do feel most antagonistic towards trends when something happens that causes a whole slew of identical proposals to come in. Sadly, 9-11 was that way. And the success of the Left Behind series resulted in several authors wanting to follow that trend. Also The Purpose-Driven Life with its 40-day concept. I began to see many 40-day clones. I said no to them all. But sometimes we say yes. The huge success of Amish fiction has not gone unnoticed by us. As a result, we are, ahem, working with one of our very best fiction authors in trying to meet the demands of this trend. But on the other hand, we recently published our first fantasy novel, and that was very "untrendy" of us. We had not done this before, but this author, George Bryan Polivka, and his Trophy Chase trilogy of books are superior fiction in just about every way. And I’m not even a fantasy reader.

I’d say to write the book you want and find the editor who will look at it. I’ve not shied away from looking at book proposals in areas where we don’t normally publish. But if the writing quality isn’t there, that’s two major strikes against it (unpopular genre and poor writing). But if the writing is excellent, I’ll take it to the committee, even with that one strike against it (unpopular genre).

Is there any genre you don’t want to see in the proposals or manuscripts that come to you? Any you’re particularly looking for?

In what may seem a contradiction to what I said above, I’m not a good judge of biblical fiction, spiritual warfare fiction, or end-times fiction, and unless there is some compelling reason, will probably not spend much time on a proposal for one of those genres. As for what I’m looking for, it’s hard to say. Right now, historical fiction is the "in" trend. I think we’re about due for some Regency fiction, and I’m taking a hard look at some pretty good proposals in that genre right now.

What do you see in the future--say, in the next five years or so--for CBA publishing? The bad and the good?

As the independent CBA stores close and more Christians are buying their books in the general marketplace, I’m thinking that we might see more of an opportunity to pick up readers from those general market bookstores who would previously never have purchased a Christian novel. There are PLENTY of readers (not necessarily Christian) who are tired of the despair and angst of most contemporary fiction. I think many of the novels CBA publishers are producing would please them very much. If so, that’s a whole new--HUGE--market for us. As for further predictions, I’ll pass. It’s just very hard to know.

Is there an area that seems to give even your more widely published authors difficulty? Any tips on how to overcome it?

With the many new fiction titles being published, it’s hard for new authors to be noticed and for older ones to continue to be noticed. So, as with nonfiction, more and more fiction authors are having to learn how to actively promote their fiction. This is a relatively recent trend and can be frustrating for authors who simply enjoy writing good fiction, but are not necessarily good at speaking or promoting their books.

What do you like to do in your spare time, when you’re not editing or reading proposals or going to meetings or working on cover copy or ... wait: do you have any spare time?

Not much spare time! When I do have time, I like to buy old books at thrift stores and sell them on Amazon.com. I do rather well at it. I’m afraid that with family, my editing, my own writing, and the used book selling, there really isn’t much time left over.

Anything we didn’t ask that you wish we had? Feel free to hold forth!

Here are a few interesting (or not) tidbits:

Favorite fiction author: Barbara Pym.

Favorite nonfiction authors: Watchman Nee, Andrew Murray, Oswald Chambers.

Favorite movies: "Oklahoma", "The Night of the Hunter", The Thin Man series, The Andy Hardy series.

Last novel read: Johan Bojer’s The Emigrants, which I loved...and unexpectedly so.

Current quote: "People read fiction for emotion, not information." Sinclair Lewis.

Three interesting facts about me:

1.I’m an only child.

2.I was born in Mississippi and still retain a strong sense of the south and generally like southern authors.

3.Before we were married, my wife and I lived in a Christian commune in San Francisco’s Haight-Ashbury district.

Nick Harrison is senior editor at Harvest House Publishers and the author of numerous books in his own right, including His Victorious Indwelling, Magnificent Prayer, and Promises to Keep: Daily Devotions for Men of Integrity.

Coming Monday ...

Typewriter Last week, author/friend Angie Hunt and I teamed up and asked Harvest House senior editor, Nick Harrison, to answer a few questions we thought would be of interest to our readers. You can read Nick's replies here at Grace Notes on Monday, Nov. 26.

BJ

My Thanksgiving Wish for You

683788992thanksgiving_bouquet_2 At the Hoff house, this is the week the holidays "officially" begin. We've already trimmed the tree--for some reason years ago we made it a tradition to always have the tree decorated before Thanksgiving. The wreaths and other decorations will go up this week, and by next Sunday I should have at least a few ideas for gift shopping. We've been playing Christmas music and downloading even more for several days now (actually, I have a few albums I play year-round as the mood moves me), and the cookie tins and trays will come down from the top shelves soon.

I'll be off the blog the rest of this week, so I wanted to take this opportunity to send each of you a special Thanksgiving wish. Following is the message I post every year. As always, I'm even more thankful for the "old" blessings that grow only more precious with time--and for the new ones granted since I last posted this Thanksiving entry ...   

~~~~~~~~~~

I’m thankful for the God who saved me, the family who loves me, the home that shelters me, the friends who believe in me, a church that welcomes me .... For seasons that change and truth that doesn’t ... For music that stirs and soothes and heals and speaks of feelings beyond those I can voice ... For a country that values freedom and is willing to pay the price to preserve it for ourselves and others .... I’m thankful for countless books to read, and for those readers who read the books I write, for the editors who make the books better, and for the publishers who make the books possible .... I’m thankful for small furry creatures that make me smile when nothing else can, for the sturdy oak trees in my back yard that grew up with my children and now shade my grandchildren and give sanctuary to my memories .... I’m thankful for every gift of goodness that brings me gladness, every trial that takes me to my knees, and every prayer uttered in my behalf that made a difference, though often unknown to the one who cared enough to pray ....

And I’m thankful for you, every one of you, that you trust me enough to ask me for an answer to a question or offer a word of encouragement or a prayer. You bless me again and again with your caring hearts. 

I wish you a bountiful, prayerful, joyful Thanksgiving and a holiday season that blankets you and those you love with amazing grace and enduring peace.

God bless you.

BJ

Q & A

Clip8_21_3 Q.Is there any particular theme that reoccurs in your books?

A.I've been told that it's hope. I've never set out to "insert" a theme or write around a theme, but after enough editors and readers mentioned this to me and I thought about the different stories that make up my novels, I can see the reoccurence. And if that's the case, it's probably because I believe hope to be as essential as the breath of life itself. To live without hope would be, I believe, to not live at all.

Q.What kind of music do you listen to when you're writing?

A. None. I discovered fairly early that, because music has such a strong appeal to me, I easily lose my concentration if I have even background music playing while I try to work. However, I do have music on--usually classical or Celtic--when I'm thinking through a story and its characters, planning a scene, or just brainstorming with myself about a plot thread. Actually, the only time music isn't on in my house is when I'm writing.

Q.Are you left-handed or right?

A.I'm a lefty. And I ran across an interesting article in the newspaper the other day about lefthanded people that I wanted to blog about--but I lost the article. In the meantime, though, one thing I remember about it was the suggestion that lefties tend to lose things easily.

Q.What tv shows are you watching this season?

A.Very few. Apparently, I won't be watching "24," thanks to the writers' strike. Lost interest in "Lost" a long time ago. I confess to being hooked on "Friday Night Lights," though, because I'm a football fan and I just love the characters' accents. We probably watch the Animal Planet and Discovery channels more than any others. Most of all, we watch movies. My husband and I both are huge movie fans, especially some of the golden oldies.

Q.What's your favorite Scripture verse?

A.I have more than one, but if asked for my "life verse," that would be 2 Corinthians 1:20--"For no matter how many promises God has made, they are 'Yes' in Christ." 

BJ

November Notes

November_dayI'm looking out the window on a cold, wind-driven rain that's stripping the trees of their final colors and reminding me that, yes, the holidays are coming, but so is winter and the end of the year. In addition to the weather, there's an extra layer of grayness over Ohio today, a mourning going on. The promise of a championship season ended in the OSU 'shoe Saturday at the hands of a team that delivered an exceedingly painful surprise. If you know anything about Ohio and football, you know I'm not exaggerating when I use the word "mourning." Wisdom says that in any game there has to be a loser, right? But it's supposed to be the other team.

----------

As it happens, it's also November in the manuscript I'm working on: Rachel's Secret. It's the first book in a new series (The Riverhaven Years). With winter approaching in both real time and in story time, I'll have to be careful not to give in to the "bleak midwinter syndrome." Fortunately, I'm not one who, like my husband as well as my closest friend, harbors a need for light that can turn desperate about the middle of November, surely Ohio's grayest, gloomiest month. Along about January, I threaten to imprison both of these dear ones in a brightly lit Florida room somewhere and throw away the key until May. Actually, I'm one of those weird types who seems wired to enjoy winter days, even the cold, gray ones. I know a number of other writers who share the same madness. It might be something about the snugness of being cloistered against the elements, tucked away from whatever wildness is taking place outside, that draws us more easily into the other worlds we're bent on creating. Whatever the cause of this peculiarity (or sickness), some of us thrive on these days when it seems perfectly reasonable to shut ourselves inside and work.

My husband prays daily for my recovery.

----------

At the same time that I'm working my way through this new story, I'm continuing the research on the current series and also the one waiting in the wings. And in the process I've discovered something I've missed that I intend to remedy. I've never taken a riverboat ride--and I know now that I must. You know those lists that float around with the "ten things to do before you die," etc.? Well, I'm adding a steamboat ride to mine, right near the top.

But not in November.

----------

Congratulations to Jill Eileen Smith on her first publishing contract. For over twenty years, Jill has worked and studied and waited and prayed, always persevering, never giving up, all the while trusting God for His will, even if it meant never seeing a contract. But Jill now has a contract, a well-deserved one. You would have to know Jill's story to better understand her journey, why I've so admired her perseverance and her resolve, and why it's such a pleasure to congratulate her.   

You did it, Jill. Godspeed.

BJ

Veterans Day 2007

Vets_day

With all due respect ...

Thank you.

A Couple of Things ...

Twins No doubt you're aware that there's an encroaching trend to drop "of" from its usage with the word "couple." It seems the popular construction now is to write "a couple unicorns" instead of "a couple of unicorns" or "couple months" instead of "a couple of months." Some view this as a British affectation (if you're not British, that is). I don't know about that, but it does seem clumsy and therefore a weak kind of usage.   

I don't like it, and I'm not falling in line. I'll be quick to add that I'm not alone. As James Kilpatrick pointed out in a recent column, the Associated Press isn't compromising either. (And their Stylebook informs at least a thousand newspapers.)  They insist that the "of" is necessary. Kilpatrick--one of our leading grammarians--is uncharacteristically forceful about the issue, citing one example of  this kind of omission as "crude, clumsy, truncated and awkward ... It's ham without the eggs ... Romeo deprived of Juliet."

Bryan Garner (Garner's Modern American Usage), the "expert" I turn to even more often than Kilpatrick and Bernstein, also insists on the "of," calling its omission "slipshod." Same with The Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. And although Bernstein doesn't "forbid" it, he calls it "ungraceful." 

It seems to me that the use of "of" as described defies argument if for no other reason than the avoidance of awkwardness. Writers are continually instructed against using any word or construction that intrudes on the reading experience, that forces a reader to stumble, or even stop. For many grammarians and writers, this is only one of the reasons to keep the "of."

I could give you a couple of other reasons I'm against dropping the "of," but I'll spare you a full-blown rant.

Or would you like to know how I really feel?

BJ

The ESV Literary Study Bible

2007_04_literary_exterior_2I've collected Bibles for many years, but hadn't made any new additions for a long time--until recently. Although I'd read quite a lot about the ESV Literary Study Bible before its release, I hadn't been too interested because I've been using an ESV translation for some time now. In fact, it's one of the two translations I use most, but I already had a nice leather edition and wasn't thinking to buy the same translation in a different format. But after downloading some sample pages, reading a feature overview, and sampling some online reviews, I changed my mind.

This is in no way a review, but only my personal response to what would seem to be a wonderfully original Bible. To my knowledge, there's not another version around that compares with it. If you want to learn more about it than time and space allows here, there are numerous comprehensive reviews available, many of which you can find by just going to this page at the ESV Bible Blog. 

There's always the possibility that an erroneous assumption will be made about a Bible carrying the term "literary." For example, too many classes that teach the Bible as literature employ only a humanistic, liberal approach. But the theology of Leland Ryken and Philip Graham Ryken, the general editors of the ESV Literary Study Bible, is thoroughly evangelical, and they clearly acknowledge the Bible as divinely inspired. This is not a "looose" translation or a paraphrase, but an essentially literal translation. I've detected no noticeable liberal slant, and certainly the "Bible as literature" concept in this work doesn't minimize the importance of the "Bible as God's Holy Word."

Just a little about the overall format: The text is presented in single column, black text, with each book receiving an overview and introduction. It's described as a "study Bible," because it contains commentary, but the commentary focuses on the literary aspects of Scripture rather than merely providing references. This appeals to me because I've never been a huge fan of the more traditional "study Bibles" with the endless footnotes and references. Unless I'm doing an exhaustive topic study, I sometimes find the voluminous notes distracting.

If you think this is only a "writer's Bible" (because of the literary format), it's not at all. It's more a "reader's Bible," in that it's been designed to facilitate reading through the Scriptures rather than simply analyzing sections through reference notes. One of the more appealing features (for me) is that, although the format uses the traditional chapter and verse numbers, it enables the reader to grasp the passage as a whole. It's much more a Bible for reading than for reference. It does away with the temptation to read the references instead of the Word itself.

Although it's definitely a reader-friendly Bible, it's also artistically, even elegantly, designed and formatted. To simplify any description, it's an enjoyable, "pleasurable" Bible to read.

The only negative I've found--and this is undoubtedly more a personal dislike, certainly not a common distraction, although I've seen this same complaint in a couple of reviews--is the font. I wish it might have been just a wee bit larger and darker. If your eyes are often tired--and mine are--this particular font isn't the best. I'd have to say it can even contribute to some eyestrain. That may seem a small thing, given all the positives that can be said about this work, but it's a very real irritation for some.

One thing is certain: the more I use this Bible, the more I want to use it. For me, that justifies the expense of a second ESV.

BJ

Choking on Agendas

ChokingI suppose you might call this a rant. But I prefer to call it an opinion piece. Gives it a touch more class, don't you think? Whatever you call it, it's my way of saying that I am weary and impatient and disgruntled with the Hollywood agenda. No--wait: let's expand that and make it the media agenda. 

This week my husband and I stopped three films in progress and turned off the DVD player because we're both really tired of having this and that agenda stuffed down our throats. We find ourselves doing this more and more often these days.

Filmmakers  have their own particular pets, as you undoubtedly know. By now we're all familiar with the anti-Bush agenda. The anti-war agenda. The anti-Christian (especially anti-evangelical) agenda. The anti-creationism agenda. And of course Michael Moore's anti-America agenda. On the pro side, we have the gay agenda and the feminist agenda and the abortion rights agenda and the--oh, you know. Unless you've been living in a cave, you know exactly what I'm talking about.

We're either being spoon-fed or, in a number of areas, force-fed, the beliefs and agendas of a media system that includes film, television, journalism, and publishing in general, and there seems to be no escaping it. In most areas, it's such a brazenly obvious attempt to influence our belief system that it would be ludicrous if it weren't so tiresome. Many of us are now to the point that we don't need to rent a movie to find the agenda contained within--we've only to watch the preview or read the review to know which corner of our minds they're going to mess with next. There are some efforts that are more subtle, of course. At least the originators would like to think so. But the practice has become so widespread it's growing increasingly difficult to effect any real degree of subtlety. The blow to the head seems to be hammering harder with every effort.

Not that this is really new. History confirms that there have always been attempts on the part of the media to inflict their convictions on the masses. Think of the anti-Catholic, anti-female suffrage, anti-civil rights movements. Why, there were even ... gasp ... all manner of anti-Irish campaigns (highly successful ones, I'm loath to add).

It's just that now the media encompasses such a huge, diverse--and powerful--bloc as opposed to yesterday, when the spear carriers were almost entirely dependent on the printed word of newspapers and books. Now independent thought, especially if it contains a modicum of morality or decency ... or common sense ... would seem to be at the mercy of a multitude of venues through which the values of a few can attempt to override the traditional values and beliefs of generations.

Think I'm exaggerating? Then pay closer attention to movie reviews--and the movies themselves. The slant of various newspaper articles and editorials. Magazine opinion pieces. The books populating the bestseller lists, especially those in, but not limited to, nonfiction. Television series. Video games. Oh--and don't forget school textbooks. And dare I mention blogs?

Certainly none of us can any longer be surprised by this. It's all too common, and it's been going on for years. What we are, I suspect, is tired of it all. Excessively tired. And that's the danger. When we become tired of a thing, we tend to tune it out, to ignore it, to discount it, to grow numb to its implications and its influence.

Just one example: consider the profanity and vulgarisms cropping up in today's television offerings, especially the series format. It hasn't been so many years ago that the words now being spewed on a weekly and even nightly basis would have launched a flood of viewer complaints to the respective networks and even caused a few sponsors to drop their ads. 

Then poll your local stations and/or some of the networks to see how many complaints they've received over the past few months.

Point taken?

BJ -- growing tired but trying not to grow numb.

My Photo

Bio

Contact

Just released!

Note to Readers:

  • Please note that the books listed in this sidebar under "What I'm Reading" and "Recently Read" do not in any way represent a recommendation. These are simply lists of some of the books I'm currently reading and have recently read, not a "thumbs-up" for any single title. Don't blame me for content you dislike or disapprove of--I didn't write them. -BJ

Words for Today


  • "What is written without effort is in general read without pleasure". -Samuel Johnson

Music for Writing (And Reading)